Has Susan Boyle really got talent?
Sorry, but I just can't see what all the fuss is about.
Susan Boyle's first appearance on Britain's Got Talent was incredible, because the voice that came out of her just didn't go with the way she looked.
But now we know what to expect, is she really such an amazing singer? I don't think so.
When she came on tonight's live semi-final, she started with a quavering voice that seemed a little out of tune.
True, she got better, and given the rest of the contestants in her round, she deserved to go through. Even if she is a bit weird.
The real stars of the night, the most worthy winners who worked hardest to be entertaining, were Diversity and I really hope they do well.
I hate to say it but smug Simon was mostly on the money tonight (except when he looked like a dirty old man, perving at the belly dancer).
He was right when he said the violinist wasn't likable, and in his opposition to the revolting Nick Hell. But why did it take Piers so long to realise what a disgusting act it was? He and Amanda must have fought hard to get him a place in the semi-final, which could have gone to someone with genuine talent.
Darth Jackson shouldn't have unmasked himself. As the asthmatic Dark Lord, he still had some enigma, but when he took the helmet off he looked every inch a completely unmenacing Brummie postal worker.
Older/Newer
« Ear, ear, Scott | Howard was robbed, Lorraine should have gone »
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Has Susan Boyle really got talent? .
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.sundaymercury.net/cgi-bin/mt421/mt-tb.cgi/128672




Totally agree she is very average. I hope the Welsh singer wins it - he is very talented.
Susan Boyle knows she is good. But she isn't as good as she thinks and has clearly believed all her own hype.